话说上次小羊撤销案子的动议,被法官驳回,理由是你船票还没收到呢,急什么急?原来小月又是四顾茅庐,又是拍照留念,又是留船票在信箱,最后还动议要求法官承认其先斩后奏的电邮传递,结果法官说船票没送到,电邮传递驳回。还好法官给指出一条明路,你可以用CCP &415.40,用邮寄方法送。
小月如获至宝,先在联邦法院小试锋芒,在另一起案子中用了CCP &415.40,邮寄了船票后,日子一到就要求default(缺席审判),被法院秘书驳回,正不知所措。还好,这边既是法官的建议,又有小羊配合承认。却不料想,今日又被踢出,理由还是船票木送到:哥们,你往国外送船票,加州3000万人民管不着,你得按照海牙会议走。
唉,咋办?学的法律都白学了?还是美国法官素质太低?要不就是跟小月过不去?老农我猜,法官看出来了,你这是无事生非,那就给你多找点麻烦。其实不然,还是小月的法律不精,如果是个贞律师,按照法律条文办,何苦屡屡踢铁板?
这个是法院的初步裁决(Tentative Ruling):
第一:船票木送到,加州3000万人民管不了,你得走国际海牙会议法;
第二:小羊那个什么撤销案子的议案也先歇歇,船票没收到,急什么急?
第三:什么审前取证?歇了吧,猴急。
结果,小月“雄关漫道真如铁,而今还得从头越,”辛辛苦苦白费劲,一下回到半年前:从头开始,再送船票。而那些用取证要把小羊拉入General appearance的小把戏也木有了。小羊,你也别猴急,等拿到船票,再发声。
TR - Motion to Quash Service of Summons Purs. to 418.10 CCP - Granted in Part
12/15/2015 |
This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Dennis Hayashi The Motion of Specially Appearing Defendant Wenbin Yang to Quash Service of the Summons and Complaint for Defamation of Plaintiff Dongxiao Yue, pursuant to CCP § 418.10(a), is GRANTED IN PART. The Motion to Quash Service of the Summons is GRANTED. Plaintiff has not filed a sufficient Proof of Service of the Summons. Plaintiff's attempts to serve the Summons on Defendant in Toronto, Canada, have been insufficient. Plaintiff is not permitted to employ the methods for serving Defendant under the California Code of Civil Procedure because state law is preempted by the provisions of the Hague Convention. The full text of the applicable provisions of the Hague Convention can be found on the United States Department of State website (http://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal-considerations/judicial/service-of-process.html). Defendant's alternative Motion to Quash for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court declines to consider Defendant's contention that it lacks personal jurisdiction over him until he has been properly served with the Summons. The Court also declines to make any orders with respect to the procedures for conducting pretrial discovery. That request is also premature under the circumstances. The Court will prepare the order and mail copies to Plaintiff and Specially Appearing Defendant. NOTICE: Effective June 4, 2012, the Court will not provide a court reporter for civil law and motion hearings, any other hearing or trial in civil departments, or any afternoon hearing in Department 201 (probate). See amended Local Rule 3.95. |
Powered by Discuz! X3.2
© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.